By Denys Kuzin in AI Papers — 26 Jan 2025

ISP²: “Understanding Before Reasoning” to Unlock AI’s Missing Pieces

Understanding Before Reasoning: A Friendly Overview

Let’s talk about a new approach to helping computers think more clearly. This research is about a method called “Iterative Summarization Pre-Prompting” (often shortened to ISP²). The paper focuses on two main ideas:
1. How large language models (LLMs) can better “understand” critical information.
2. How that deeper understanding can lead to better answers and outcomes.

This method is designed for artificial intelligence models that generate text. It aims to help them pick up the key facts first, so they can then tackle the real question more accurately. Below is a quick tour of why this matters, how it works, and what it could mean for everyday AI use.

The Big Picture

Think of a child learning to solve math problems. The child might start by writing down key numbers, figuring out the relationships between them, and then carefully walking through each step to solve the problem. In the same way, large language models can benefit from listing out important pieces of information first, rather than jumping straight into conclusions.

Traditionally, many AI approaches rely on something called “Chain-of-Thought” (CoT) reasoning. This method encourages the AI to show its thinking step-by-step. But there’s a little snag with CoT: sometimes crucial information isn’t clearly stated in the question, so the AI may not pick up on it, leading to shaky answers.

That’s where the new concept of ISP² steps in. Instead of relying on the AI to piece everything out in a single step, ISP² helps it gather the most critical facts first—like carefully picking the right puzzle pieces—so it can then put them together to form a better answer.

Why Do We Need This Approach?

Missing Pieces Lead to Flawed Answers

When you ask a complicated question, sometimes important details are implied rather than spelled out. Imagine reading a mystery novel: the clues can be subtle. If you skip those details, you’ll probably get the ending wrong. Similarly, if an AI doesn’t notice a hidden clue or an implicit hint, it might generate an incorrect response.

Predicting Mistakes is Harder Than It Looks

These large language models are astonishingly powerful. They can take in large amounts of text and generate detailed responses. Yet they are not perfect. Sometimes they miss context. Sometimes they misread the exact meaning. ISP² tries to prevent those hiccups by ensuring the AI focuses on extracting key facts first.

Building Trust and Reliability

One of the biggest challenges in AI is building trust. Nobody wants an AI assistant that answers confidently yet incorrectly. By bolstering how the AI understands a question, ISP² can strengthen the reliability of these tools. This is especially critical in fields like healthcare or finance, where one misunderstood fact could lead to major consequences.

A Gentle Explanation of ISP²

Step 1: Identify the Important Bits

The first thing ISP² does is to comb through the question (or text) to find the essential entities and their descriptions. In simpler terms, it picks out the main characters and key attributes. For example, if the question is about a medical scenario, the model might identify both the patient and the relevant symptoms.

Step 2: Test Their Reliability

Next, each piece of information is given a confidence rating—or “reliability.” It’s like putting each fact under a small spotlight and asking, “How sure are we about this?” The pieces with the lowest confidence are then merged together to form a new piece of information. Think of it as combining two vague puzzle pieces into one clearer piece.

Step 3: Repeat Until Clear

This merging process keeps going until there’s only one final piece of key information left. It’s a bit like making a sauce: you start with many ingredients, but you boil them down until you’re left with a pure essence. This final piece is what the model ends up using, along with the question, to generate the final answer.

Step 4: Produce the Answer

Now that the AI has its distilled summary and the original question, it can do its reasoning. The end result is that the AI’s answer is typically stronger—because it has picked up on, or created, the “missing pieces” early.

Real-Life Benefits

1. More Accurate AI Assistants

Algorithms using ISP² should be less prone to random or “hallucinated” facts. We often hear about AI making up its own story if it’s not sure about something. With ISP², the goal is to reduce this by ensuring that the AI has locked in the truths it really needs.

2. Easier to Follow Explanations

Because the AI collects key points separately and merges them, the explanation it provides can be easier to follow. It’s like having a quick summary before the final solution. This is especially handy for educators or anyone wanting to see how the AI arrived at a particular answer.

3. Better for Complex Tasks

Whether it’s advanced scientific research or multi-layered business strategies, complex tasks usually involve multiple pieces of background knowledge. By offering a structured way to gather that background knowledge up front, ISP² might help AI systems tackle tasks that are too winding or ambiguous for simpler approaches.

4. Fewer Wrong Turns

Large language models sometimes get sidetracked by irrelevant details. ISP² encourages a narrower focus on the essential bits of information. With fewer distractions, the AI can concentrate on the logic that truly matters.

Example Scenario (In Plain Language)

Suppose a model is asked:
“Sarah reads a newspaper article about her favorite musician. The article mentions he was born in a large city known for its famous red bridge. What city was the musician born in?”

A normal AI might try to directly answer “San Francisco” if it recognizes the clue about the Golden Gate Bridge. But if the detail is hidden behind indirect hints, a less careful approach might guess something else, like “New York,” just because it’s a big city.

Here’s where ISP² comes in:

Collect Facts: “Musician’s city is known for a famous red bridge,” “The city is large,” “The musician is Sarah’s favorite.”
Rate Confidence: Maybe we aren’t sure about the phrase “famous red bridge” and whether “large city” is necessary.
Merge the Low Confidence Items: The clues “red bridge” + “large city” merge to become “large city known for a red bridge = San Francisco.”
Final Key Info: “Musician was born in San Francisco.”
Answer: “San Francisco.”

This example might be oversimplified, but the idea is that the AI systematically prunes and refines the details to arrive at the correct city. That’s how ISP² helps the AI zero in on the real answer.

How This Compares to Traditional Prompting

Traditional “prompting” means you give the AI a question or scenario all at once and let it figure out the reasoning in a single shot (or maybe do a chain-of-thought). But we risk drowning the AI in too much text, or letting it miss details that were implied rather than stated outright.

ISP², on the other hand, is a more careful dance. By summarizing and re-summarizing until the ambiguous or hidden details become clearer, the AI is less likely to rush into an answer that’s missing important context.

Potential Drawbacks and Resolutions

No approach is perfect. Here are some potential challenges with ISP²:

Time and Complexity: Extra steps require more decisions by the model. This might mean slower response times.
Could Over-Summarize: In trying to merge everything, the model might merge too aggressively and lose nuances.
Requires a Good Rating System: The reliability ratings for each piece of information need to be balanced so that the AI doesn’t either distrust everything or trust everything equally.

Yet the paper suggests these issues are manageable, and the accuracy gains might justify the added effort. Over time, as AI becomes even more efficient, slight slowdowns won’t matter if the final answers see a meaningful boost in correctness.

Broader Impact

Education

Imagine AI tutors or assistants for students. With ISP², the tutor could systematically pull out the key wisdom from a story problem before explaining how to solve it. This approach can help the student see how to separate important clues from irrelevant details.

Research and Healthcare

When researchers or medical professionals consult an AI for scientific questions, the stakes are high. Overlooking a subtle but critical piece of data can lead to flawed conclusions. A methodical approach that merges relevant clues might lead to safer results and fewer mistakes.

Business and Finance

Businesses increasingly rely on AI for analytics and forecasting. If an AI system misses one crucial piece of data—like market trends or consumer behavior patterns—it could lead to big mistakes. ISP² can provide an extra layer of security by ensuring big decisions are based on carefully reviewed facts.

Technological Outlook

A Stepping Stone, Not a Magic Wand

ISP² doesn’t magically fix all AI reasoning problems. Rather, it’s a stepping stone that suggests a good principle: be sure the AI collects the right puzzle pieces before it tries to solve the puzzle. Future solutions could build on this approach, perhaps by automatically spotting ambiguous phrases or by interacting with external knowledge bases to verify key details.

Fits Well with Other AI Advancements

Because ISP² guides the AI to gather essential facts, it could combine nicely with other AI improvements like advanced text embeddings or specialized AI systems that focus on reasoning in academic fields. By blending these enhancements, we might see even more robust performance.

Open Source and Community

The paper’s authors have shared their code with the community. This open-source spirit invites developers, researchers, and tech enthusiasts to tweak, test, and expand the method, potentially discovering new ways to make AI reasoning more reliable and transparent.

Tips for the Curious Reader

Read the Paper: The original paper, titled “Understanding Before Reasoning: Enhancing Chain-of-Thought with Iterative Summarization Pre-Prompting,” is available on arXiv.
Explore the Code: You can see how this method works in practice by checking out the GitHub repository at https://github.com/zdhgreat/ISP-2.
Try an Example: If you have access to a large language model platform, you can experiment with feeding it partial summaries first, then watch how it changes the final answer.

Final Thoughts

In a world where AI continues to grow more powerful, ensuring that it properly “understands” a question before answering matters more than ever. ISP² is a fresh approach that’s fairly simple at heart: gather the puzzle pieces, merge them carefully, and only then finalize the answer. It’s a practical strategy to reduce mistakes, especially when important clues are implied, hidden, or buried under layers of text.

While it won’t singlehandedly solve all the challenges of AI reasoning, ISP² offers a valuable lens for the next wave of intelligent systems. Ultimately, thoughtful designs like this push us one step closer to AI that’s not only strong at generating text but also meticulous in how it interprets and uses information.

Authored by Denys Kuzin at the DK Review.
Check out the DK Review podcast for more insights on AI, tech leadership, and best practices in software development.